The Hudsons Bay Company :: essays research papers fc

Lawmaking is a complicated, complex and comprehensive process which involves the locating, focusing and directing of social surmount. There atomic number 18 strong theories about the essence of social control. Some sociologists have even concluded that social control as a concept should be discard totally beca intent its power as an analytical tool was weakened through an unhealthy combination of overuse and down the stairs-explanation. As Chunn and Gavigan point out, it is not sufficient to use social control as an analytic tool when one begins with the approach that (1) either the meaning of the concept is too obvious to need definition or (2) the concept is undefinable but can be used without being defined. For the purposes of this study, an attempt will be made to examine the dialectical relationship in the midst of legal power and social control using the Hudsons Bay Companys monolithic jurisdiction over a large part of North America. The period under study is from the Comp anys chartering in 1670 until 1821, when a new regulatory act was passed. An examination of the legal system which was operative in the late 17th and entire eighteenth century in Ruperts Land offers insight into the roots of the Canadian legal process. In spite of the corporate nature of the Company-run Ruperts Land, I believe that a closemouthed study of legal questions, cases and decisions that arose during the Companys first one hundred and fifty years will indicate that all the social control mechanisms were not in the Companys hands. instead a synergy between the Company and the frontierspeople determined the nature of the laws.To cope with the above-mentioned difficulties in using social control as an analytical tool, I plan to use the conceptual theme of social controls suggested by Russell Smandych. Smandychs approach returns analytical usefulness to the social control concept. He examines the layers, levels, nuances, and threads of social control that both define and conf ine behavior. He takes social control analysis a necessary extra step by recognizing that it is not an entirety in and of itself but that it is a collection of controls, each operating at a different level. And rather than using the controls found in a society as explanations of that society, Smandych recommends using the possibility of these controls as analytical devices for restudying and rethinking a society.The Hudsons Bay Company was entitled to handle all law making, enforcement, and execution from 1670 until 1870. Because the Hudsons Bay Company was works with a tabula rasa (especially as it did not give consideration to aboriginal laws), judicially speaking, it offers a prime example for viewing the development of law from step one.